Radeon 660M vs P102-101

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.82
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP102Rembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2018 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3200384
Core clock speed1557 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1670 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate334.045.60
Floating-point processing power10.69 TFLOPS1.459 TFLOPS
ROPs8016
TMUs20024
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L0 Cacheno data96 KB
L1 Cache1.2 MB128 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount10 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2002 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 40 Watt

Radeon 660M has a 167% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between P102-101 and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that P102-101 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 9 votes

Rate P102-101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 493 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-101 or Radeon 660M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.