Arc A310 vs P102-101

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.25
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP102DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2018 (6 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3200768
Core clock speed1557 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1670 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate334.064.00
Floating-point processing power10.69 TFLOPS3.072 TFLOPS
ROPs8016
TMUs20032
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount10 GB4 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.3 GB/s124.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

P102-101 has a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between P102-101 and Arc A310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that P102-101 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA P102-101
P102-101
Intel Arc A310
Arc A310

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 5 votes

Rate P102-101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 249 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.