Radeon HD 7560G IGP vs P102-100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGP102Devastator Lite
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3200256
Core clock speed1582 MHz496 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz760 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate336.612.16
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS0.3891 TFLOPS
ROPs808
TMUs20016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount5 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1376 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 February 2018 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 16 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

P102-100 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7560G IGP, on the other hand, has 614.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between P102-100 and Radeon HD 7560G IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7560G IGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
AMD Radeon HD 7560G IGP
Radeon HD 7560G IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 27 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.