Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking572not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.99no data
Power efficiency2.10no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3+ (2024)
GPU code nameGP102no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3200128
Core clock speed1582 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1683 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate336.6no data
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPSno data
ROPs80no data
TMUs200no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5Xno data
Maximum RAM amount5 GBno data
Memory bus width320 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1376 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/sno data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between P102-100 and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 34 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 15 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.