Matrox Millennium G200 vs P102-100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking560not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.96no data
Power efficiency2.41no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)G200 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameGP102Eclipse
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)1998 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3200no data
Core clock speed1582 MHz84 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate336.60.08
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPSno data
ROPs801
TMUs2001
L1 Cache1.2 MBno data
L2 Cache2.5 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCI
Length267 mm150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSGR
Maximum RAM amount5 GB8 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s1.144 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)5.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 350 nm

P102-100 has a 63900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2087.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between P102-100 and Matrox Millennium G200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox Millennium G200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
Matrox Millennium G200
Millennium G200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 36 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 9 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or Matrox Millennium G200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.