RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs NX-SoC

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated10
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.48
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM20BAD103
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2017 (7 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2567680
Core clock speed384 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed768 MHz2580 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate12.29619.2
Floating-point processing power0.3932 TFLOPS39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.38.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2017 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 20 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 210 Watt

NX-SoC has 1300% lower power consumption.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NX-SoC and RTX 4500 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NX-SoC is a notebook card while RTX 4500 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18 votes

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.