GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs NX-SoC

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGM20BGT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2017 (8 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25616
Core clock speed384 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed768 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,000 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate12.294.160
Floating-point processing power0.3932 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs168
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.31.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2017 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 20 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 40 Watt

NX-SoC has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NX-SoC and GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NX-SoC is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NX-SoC or GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.