Tesla X2070 vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking820not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.20no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM107GF110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 November 2015 (9 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×2512
Core clock speed902 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×241.66
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×21.332 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×248
TMUs32 ×264
L1 Cache256 KB1 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×26 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×2177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.02.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2015 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 225 Watt

NVS 810 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 230.9% lower power consumption.

Tesla X2070, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between NVS 810 and Tesla X2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
NVIDIA Tesla X2070
Tesla X2070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or Tesla X2070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.