GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking820not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.19no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGM107GB205
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 November 2015 (9 years ago)2026

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×26400
Core clock speed902 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2512 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×2502.4
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×232.15 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×280
TMUs32 ×2200
Tensor Coresno data200
Ray Tracing Coresno data50
L1 Cache256 KB6.3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length198 mm245 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×218 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×2672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA5.012.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 18 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 275 Watt

NVS 810 has 304.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 800% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 810 and GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 75 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.