GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking816not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.19no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM107AD103
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 November 2015 (9 years ago)March 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×25888
Core clock speed902 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×2455.4
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×229.15 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×264
TMUs32 ×2184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache256 KB5.8 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB36 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mm240 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×212 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×2504.2 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.08.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 200 Watt

NVS 810 has 194.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 AD103, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 810 and GeForce RTX 4070 AD103. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or GeForce RTX 4070 AD103, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.