GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i vs NVS 810

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking825not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.22no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM107C79
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 November 2015 (10 years ago)18 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×216
Core clock speed902 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×23.600
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×20.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×24
TMUs32 ×28
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2015 18 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 40 Watt

NVS 810 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

9300 + nForce 730i, on the other hand, has 70% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NVS 810 and GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i
GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 nForce 730i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.