ATI Radeon 7000 vs NVS 5400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10041581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.17no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGF108RV100
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed660 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors585 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate10.560.55
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs163

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXMAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 5400M 614
+30600%
ATI 7000 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Fortnite 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 7−8 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 8−9 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 23 Watt

NVS 5400M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 52.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NVS 5400M and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 5400M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 56 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 198 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 5400M or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.