GeForce 9600 GTX vs NVS 5400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1021not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.21no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF108G92
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)27 May 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9696
Core clock speed660 MHz580 MHz
Number of transistors585 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate10.5627.84
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPS0.2784 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs1648
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXMPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s44.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 27 May 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 140 Watt

NVS 5400M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between NVS 5400M and GeForce 9600 GTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 5400M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9600 GTX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GTX
GeForce 9600 GTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 57 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 5400M or GeForce 9600 GTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.