GeForce GTX 480 512 vs NVS 5200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1098not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.66no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF117GF100
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speed625 MHz527 MHz
Number of transistors585 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0033.73
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs448
TMUs1664
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXMPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data292 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s134.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 375 Watt

NVS 5200M has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

GTX 480 512, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between NVS 5200M and GeForce GTX 480 Core 512. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 5200M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5200M
NVS 5200M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 170 votes

Rate NVS 5200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 5200M or GeForce GTX 480 Core 512, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.