NVS 510 vs Quadro P4000

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro P4000
30.09
+1562%

Quadro P4000 outperforms NVS 510 by 1562% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking171875
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money25.230.14
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP104GK107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years old)23 October 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 $449
Current price$485 (0.6x MSRP)$61 (0.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P4000 has 17921% better value for money than NVS 510.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792192
Core clock speed1202 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate165.812.75
Floating-point performance5,304 gflops306.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm160 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7604 MHz1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port1.4no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA6.13.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4000 30.09
+1562%
NVS 510 1.81

Quadro P4000 outperforms NVS 510 by 1562% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P4000 11665
+1559%
NVS 510 703

Quadro P4000 outperforms NVS 510 by 1559% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P4000 38290
+2205%
NVS 510 1661

Quadro P4000 outperforms NVS 510 by 2205% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P4000 41322
+2305%
NVS 510 1718

Quadro P4000 outperforms NVS 510 by 2305% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P4000 38590
+2910%
NVS 510 1282

Quadro P4000 outperforms NVS 510 by 2910% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+1600%
4−5
−1600%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1800%
3−4
−1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+1780%
5−6
−1780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+1925%
4−5
−1925%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+1850%
4−5
−1850%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+1825%
4−5
−1825%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+1840%
5−6
−1840%
Hitman 3 90−95
+1760%
5−6
−1760%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+1625%
4−5
−1625%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1800%
3−4
−1800%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1800%
3−4
−1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+1780%
5−6
−1780%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+1925%
4−5
−1925%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+1850%
4−5
−1850%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+1825%
4−5
−1825%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+1840%
5−6
−1840%
Hitman 3 90−95
+1760%
5−6
−1760%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+1625%
4−5
−1625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+1825%
4−5
−1825%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1800%
3−4
−1800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1800%
3−4
−1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+1780%
5−6
−1780%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+1850%
4−5
−1850%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+1825%
4−5
−1825%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+1840%
5−6
−1840%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+1800%
3−4
−1800%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Hitman 3 50−55
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1833%
3−4
−1833%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Hitman 3 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 0−1

This is how Quadro P4000 and NVS 510 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro P4000 is 1600% faster than NVS 510

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 30.09 1.81
Recency 6 February 2017 23 October 2012
Cost $815 $449
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 35 Watt

The Quadro P4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 510 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
NVIDIA NVS 510
NVS 510

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 252 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 47 votes

Rate NVIDIA NVS 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.