Quadro Plex 2100 S4 vs NVS 315

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1190not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency3.32no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF119G80
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 March 2013 (12 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48128 ×4
Core clock speed523 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors292 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt640 Watt
Texture fill rate4.18438.40 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs424 ×4
TMUs832 ×4
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB96 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mm522 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed875 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s76.8 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 March 2013 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 640 Watt

NVS 315 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 3268.4% lower power consumption.

Plex 2100 S4, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between NVS 315 and Quadro Plex 2100 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 315
NVS 315
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
Quadro Plex 2100 S4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 187 votes

Rate NVS 315 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Quadro Plex 2100 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 315 or Quadro Plex 2100 S4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.