Matrox G450 vs NVS 315

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1198not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency3.36no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameGF119Condor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 March 2013 (13 years ago)1 January 2001 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed523 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors292 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.1840.25
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs82
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length145 mm150 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed875 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 March 2013 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

NVS 315 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 315 and Matrox G450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 315 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G450 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 189 votes

Rate NVS 315 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Matrox G450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 315 or Matrox G450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.