GeForce FX 5500 PCI vs NVS 315

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1176not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency3.33no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGF119NV34 B1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 March 2013 (12 years ago)17 March 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed523 MHz270 MHz
Number of transistors292 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.1841.080
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length145 mm165 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed875 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 March 2013 17 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

NVS 315 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 315 and GeForce FX 5500 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 315 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5500 PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 315
NVS 315
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 PCI
GeForce FX 5500 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 186 votes

Rate NVS 315 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5500 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 315 or GeForce FX 5500 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.