NVS 315 vs FirePro W2100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FirePro W2100
2015
2048 MB DDR3
2.33
+162%

FirePro W2100 outperforms NVS 315 by 162% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking8091084
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.390.02
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameMarsGF119
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years old)10 March 2013 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159
Current price$123 $213 (1.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W2100 has 1850% better value for money than NVS 315.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32048
Core clock speed680 MHz523 MHz
Boost clock speed680 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate13.604.184
Floating-point performance435.2 gflops100.4 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s14 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x DMS-59
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support1no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.33
+162%
NVS 315 0.89

FirePro W2100 outperforms NVS 315 by 162% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro W2100 903
+161%
NVS 315 346

FirePro W2100 outperforms NVS 315 by 161% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

FirePro W2100 3715
+321%
NVS 315 883

FirePro W2100 outperforms NVS 315 by 321% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
+200%
4−5
−200%
4K20−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hitman 3 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hitman 3 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 2−3 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how FirePro W2100 and NVS 315 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W2100 is 200% faster than NVS 315 in 1080p

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.33 0.89
Recency 2 October 2015 10 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 19 Watt

The FirePro W2100 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 315 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
NVIDIA NVS 315
NVS 315

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 64 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 152 votes

Rate NVS 315 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.