Quadro M5000 SE vs NVS 310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1235not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency2.53no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGF119GM204
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 June 2012 (13 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed523 MHz861 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1038 MHz
Number of transistors292 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate4.184132.9
Floating-point processing power0.1004 TFLOPS4.252 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length156 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed875 MHz6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth14 GB/s211.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 100 Watt

NVS 310 has 400% lower power consumption.

M5000 SE, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 310 and Quadro M5000 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 310
NVS 310
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 SE
Quadro M5000 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 92 votes

Rate NVS 310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro M5000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 310 or Quadro M5000 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.