ATI Graphics Ultra Pro vs NVS 300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1416not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.24no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)no data
GPU code nameGT218Mach32
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 January 2011 (15 years ago)1 January 1993 (33 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed520 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.160no data
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16VLB
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3VRAM
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s80.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)None
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3None
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2011 1 January 1993
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 800 nm

NVS 300 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 300 and Graphics Ultra Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 300 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 52 votes

Rate NVS 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 300 or Graphics Ultra Pro, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.