Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
AMD FirePro M5950 vs ATI Mobility Radeon
Combined performance score
FirePro M5950 outperforms Mobility Radeon by 155% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 976 | 689 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.02 | 0.28 |
Architecture | Rage 6 (2000−2007) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | M6 | Whistler-XT |
Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 1 December 2001 (22 years old) | 13 April 2011 (12 years old) |
Current price | $202 | $386 |
FirePro M5950 has 1300% better value for money than ATI Mobility.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 480 |
Core clock speed | 144 MHz | 725 MHz |
Number of transistors | 30 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 0.43 | 17.40 |
Floating-point performance | no data | 696.0 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on Mobility Radeon and FirePro M5950 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Bus support | no data | n/a |
Interface | AGP 4x | MXM-A (3.0) |
Width | IGP | no data |
Form factor | no data | MXM-A |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 288 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 2.304 GB/s | 57 GB/s |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 7.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 9−10
−167%
| 24
+167%
|
Full HD | 10−12
−160%
| 26
+160%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.33 | 3.39 |
Recency | 1 December 2001 | 13 April 2011 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 MB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 180 nm | 40 nm |
The FirePro M5950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon is a desktop card while FirePro M5950 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.