Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs ATI Mobility Radeon X300 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR300 (2003−2008)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRS480TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2005 (21 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed300 MHz1230 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors107 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data260 Watt
Texture fill rate0.6466.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs2288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 110 nm 12 nm

RTX 8000 Passive has a 817% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X300 IGP and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X300 IGP is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon X300 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 24 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon X300 IGP or Quadro RTX 8000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.