GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV vs ATI Mobility Radeon X200 IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRS400G71
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2005 (21 years ago)12 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed300 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors107 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate0.613.80
ROPs216
TMUs224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-IV
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.1.2 (full) 3.x (partial)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm

Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X200 IGP and GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X200 IGP is a desktop graphics card while GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon X200 IGP
Mobility Radeon X200 IGP
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV
GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 11 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon X200 IGP or GeForce Go 7950 GTX MXM-IV, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.