Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Mobility X1800XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.95
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM58, R520Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2006 (19 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24768
Core clock speed8 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed550 MHz2331 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data111.9
Floating-point processing powerno data3.58 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2006 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm

Pro W6400 has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X1800XT and Radeon Pro W6400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X1800XT is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT
Mobility Radeon X1800XT
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon X1800XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 30 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon X1800XT or Radeon Pro W6400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.