GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameM58, R520GK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2006 (19 years ago)19 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores241152 ×2
Core clock speed8 MHz1006 MHz
Boost clock speed550 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data102.9 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data2.47 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data32 ×2
TMUsno data96 ×2
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed650 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2006 19 November 2013
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

GTX 760 X2 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X1800XT and GeForce GTX 760 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X1800XT is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 760 X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon X1800XT
Mobility Radeon X1800XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
GeForce GTX 760 X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon X1800XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon X1800XT or GeForce GTX 760 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.