GeForce4 Ti 4400 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1562
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameM52NV25 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 January 2006 (20 years ago)6 February 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed350 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Number of transistors107 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate1.4002.200
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data216 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)8.1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.01.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2006 6 February 2002
Chip lithography 90 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility X1300 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X1300 and GeForce4 Ti 4400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X1300 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce4 Ti 4400 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
Mobility Radeon X1300
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce4 Ti 4400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 84 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon X1300 or GeForce4 Ti 4400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.