Radeon Pro W6800X vs ATI Mobility HD 565v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.02
Power efficiencyno data15.30
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM96Navi 21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2010 (15 years ago)3 August 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203840
Core clock speed675 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2087 MHz
Number of transistors514 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60500.9
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS16.03 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs32240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cache64 KB768 KB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Apple MPX
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataApple MPX

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2010 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 200 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 565v has 900% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 565v and Radeon Pro W6800X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 565v is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6800X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 565v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 565v or Radeon Pro W6800X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.