ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs ATI Mobility HD 5650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10761596
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.46no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameMadisonRS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)5 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4002
Core clock speed450 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz180 MHz
Number of transistors627 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.0000.37
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs202
L1 Cache40 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p15no data
Full HD16no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39
+333%
9−10
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 3−4 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 333% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 performs better in 22 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

ATI Mobility HD 5650 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 284 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5650 or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.