Matrox Parhelia APVe vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1069not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.42no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameMadisonParhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)14 June 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400no data
Core clock speed450 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors627 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate9.0001.000
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs204
L1 Cache40 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.5
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 14 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility HD 5650 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and Matrox Parhelia APVe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook graphics card while Matrox Parhelia APVe is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Matrox Parhelia APVe
Parhelia APVe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 282 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia APVe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5650 or Matrox Parhelia APVe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.