Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v vs Intel HD Graphics P630
Combined performance score
HD Graphics P630 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 560v by 286% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 714 | 1100 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.02 | no data |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017) | Terascale 1 (2008−2010) |
GPU code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | M96 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 August 2016 (7 years old) | 5 May 2010 (13 years old) |
Current price | $1449 | $56 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | 320 |
Core clock speed | no data | 550 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 189 million | 514 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 17.60 |
Floating-point performance | no data | 352.0 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on HD Graphics P630 and Mobility Radeon HD 560v compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics P630 is 400% faster than the ATI Mobility HD 560v.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD Graphics P630 is ahead in 24 tests (96%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (4%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 3.09 | 0.80 |
Recency | 5 August 2016 | 5 May 2010 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 55 nm |
The HD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 560v in performance tests.
Be aware that HD Graphics P630 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 560v is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.