Tesla M2050 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameM92GF100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2010 (15 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80448
Core clock speed450 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors242 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60032.20
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPS1.03 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs856
L1 Cache16 KB896 KB
L2 Cache64 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s148.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2010 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 225 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 530v has 2150% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 530v and Tesla M2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 530v is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M2050 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 530v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Tesla M2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 530v or Tesla M2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.