Radeon Vega 8 Efficient vs ATI Mobility HD 530v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameM92Raven
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2010 (15 years ago)23 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80512
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors242 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60035.20
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPS1.126 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2010 23 April 2018
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 530v has 250% lower power consumption.

Vega 8 Efficient, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 530v and Radeon Vega 8 Efficient. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 530v is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Vega 8 Efficient is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 530v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 87 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 8 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 530v or Radeon Vega 8 Efficient, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.