Quadro FX 4000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.13
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameM92NV40
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2010 (16 years ago)1 April 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed450 MHz375 MHz
Number of transistors242 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt142 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6004.500
Floating-point processing power0.072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs812
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2010 1 April 2004
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 142 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 530v has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 136% more advanced lithography process, and 1320% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 530v and Quadro FX 4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 530v is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 4000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 530v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 22 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 530v or Quadro FX 4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.