Apollo Lake GT1 5 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameM98Apollo Lake GT1 5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800 ×2144
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors956 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Texture fill rate20.00 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs16 ×23
TMUs40 ×218
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×2no data
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2no data
Memory clock speed700 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth89.6 GB/s ×2no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm

Apollo Lake GT1 5 has a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 and Apollo Lake GT1 5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 is a notebook graphics card while Apollo Lake GT1 5 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Apollo Lake GT1 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 or Apollo Lake GT1 5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.