GeForce2 MX vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11261600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.44no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameM96NV11 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed675 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors514 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate21.600.7
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs324
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)7.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 1−2 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2009 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4670 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 28 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4670 or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.