GeForce 8700M GT SLI vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Place in the ranking	1063	1158
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.38	0.95
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	G8x (2007)
GPU code name	M96	NB8E-SE
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2009 (16 years ago)	18 September 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	64
Core clock speed	675 MHz	625 MHz
Number of transistors	514 million	578 Million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	58 Watt
Texture fill rate	21.60	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.432 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	10
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 4670 1.17
+51.9%

8700M GT SLI 0.77

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 4670 3005
+36.8%

8700M GT SLI 2196

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Fortnite	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
World of Tanks	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Valorant	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4670 is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI Mobility HD 4670 is ahead in 24 tests (71%)
there's a draw in 10 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.17	0.77
Recency	9 January 2009	18 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	58 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4670 has a 51.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 65.7% lower power consumption.

8700M GT SLI, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.