GeForce 8700M GT SLI vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4670 and GeForce 8700M GT SLI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4670
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.18
+51.3%

ATI Mobility HD 4670 outperforms 8700M GT SLI by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10631158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.370.94
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)G8x (2007)
GPU code nameM96NB8E-SE
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)18 September 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32064
Core clock speed675 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors514 million578 Million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt58 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)10
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Mobility HD 4670 1.18
+51.3%
8700M GT SLI 0.78

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 4670 3005
+36.8%
8700M GT SLI 2196

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Valorant 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4670 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4670 is ahead in 26 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 0.78
Recency 9 January 2009 18 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 58 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4670 has a 51.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 65.7% lower power consumption.

8700M GT SLI, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
GeForce 8700M GT SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4670 or GeForce 8700M GT SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.