Xe DG1 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1166not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.11no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameM96DG1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320640
Core clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors514 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate16.0062.00
Floating-point processing power0.32 TFLOPS1.984 TFLOPS
ROPs820
TMUs3240
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data164 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 30 Watt

Xe DG1 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4650 and Xe DG1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is a notebook graphics card while Xe DG1 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Intel Xe DG1
Xe DG1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 95 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 33 votes

Rate Xe DG1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4650 or Xe DG1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.