GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1158not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.10no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameM96GF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)11 July 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320144
Core clock speed500 MHz783 MHz
Number of transistors514 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate16.0018.79
Floating-point processing power0.32 TFLOPS0.451 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3224
L1 Cache64 KB192 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2009 11 July 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 106 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4650 has 202.9% lower power consumption.

GTS 450 Rev. 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4650 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 94 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 44 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4650 or GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.