GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1352not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 1 (2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameM92GT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 January 2010 (16 years ago)13 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8016
Core clock speed550 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors242 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.4004.712
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPS0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR2, DDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2010 13 June 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4550 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

9400 GT Rev. 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 4550 and GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4550 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 37 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4550 or GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.