Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile vs ATI Mobility HD 3670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1303not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.23no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM86Renoir
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)6 January 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120384
Core clock speed680 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors378 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.44036.00
Floating-point processing power0.1632 TFLOPS1.152 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs824
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.7 (6.4)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2008 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 384SP Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 686% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 21 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3670 or Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.