ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility HD 3670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1300not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.07no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameM86R360
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)4 March 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores120no data
Core clock speed680 MHz378 MHz
Number of transistors378 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate5.4403.024
Floating-point processing power0.1632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz338 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.63 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2008 4 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 60 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3670 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 172.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition
Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 21 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3670 or Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.