RTX A4000 Max-Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1313not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.08no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM86GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1205120
Core clock speed680 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1395 MHz
Number of transistors378 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate5.440223.2
Floating-point processing power0.1632 TFLOPS14.28 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s352.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2008 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 80 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3670 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3670 and RTX A4000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3670 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3670
Mobility Radeon HD 3670
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Max-Q
RTX A4000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 21 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX A4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3670 or RTX A4000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.