GeForce 205 OEM vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1354not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.87no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameM86GT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)26 November 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12016
Core clock speed500 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors378 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0004.712
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPS0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cache128 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2008 26 November 2009
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 31 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3650 has 3.3% lower power consumption.

205 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3650 and GeForce 205 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 205 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Mobility Radeon HD 3650
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
GeForce 205 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 42 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14 votes

Rate GeForce 205 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3650 or GeForce 205 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.