GeForce FX 5900 Ultra vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1519
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.13
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameM82NV35
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2008 (18 years ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed500 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors181 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt59 Watt
Texture fill rate2.0003.600
Floating-point processing power0.04 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 8x
Lengthno data218 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s27.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.19.0a
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2008 23 October 2003
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 59 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3450 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 136% more advanced lithography process, and 392% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3450 and GeForce FX 5900 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3450 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5900 Ultra is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 9 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3450 or GeForce FX 5900 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.