Radeon R5 430 OEM vs ATI Mobility HD 3430

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated804
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.71
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameM82Oland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 July 2008 (16 years ago)30 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40384
Core clock speed450 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors181 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80018.72
Floating-point processing power0.036 TFLOPS0.599 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s36.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 30 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 50 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3430 has 316.7% lower power consumption.

R5 430 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3430 and Radeon R5 430 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is a notebook card while Radeon R5 430 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 363 votes

Rate Radeon R5 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.