Radeon Pro V520 vs ATI Mobility HD 3430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.03
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameM82Navi 12
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402304
Core clock speed450 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors181 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800230.4
Floating-point processing power0.036 TFLOPS7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4144
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 225 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3430 has 1775% lower power consumption.

Pro V520, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3430 and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 17 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3430 or Radeon Pro V520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.