GeForce FX 5900 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameM82NV35
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)12 May 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40no data
Core clock speed450 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors181 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.8003.200
Floating-point processing power0.036 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 8x
Lengthno data218 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s27.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.19.0a
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 12 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm

ATI Mobility HD 3430 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3430 and GeForce FX 5900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3430 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
Mobility Radeon HD 3430
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
GeForce FX 5900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 17 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 55 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3430 or GeForce FX 5900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.