Quadro RTX 5000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.84
Power efficiencyno data12.29
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameM82TU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 July 2008 (17 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores403072
Core clock speed400 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1815 MHz
Number of transistors181 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600348.5
Floating-point processing power0.032 TFLOPS11.15 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2008 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 230 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3410 has 3186% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 3410 and Quadro RTX 5000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 3410 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 247 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 3410 or Quadro RTX 5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.