GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2700
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 100 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 96 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 33.24 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.54 |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | M76 | TU104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 December 2007 (18 years ago) | 9 July 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 120 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1770 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 390 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 5.600 | 283.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.168 TFLOPS | 9.062 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 64 |
| TMUs | 8 | 160 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 320 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 40 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.0 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 December 2007 | 9 July 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 215 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 2700 has 514% lower power consumption.
RTX 2070 Super, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 2700 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 2700 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
